sexta-feira, 23 de abril de 2010
TEc "The importance of not being Greece" Portugal and the financial markets onslaught
Where does Portugal go from here(?), appears to be an all-pervasive unanswered non-question in this country today.
It is an established fact that Portugal and Greece are different enough for financial markets to take notice.Not because the government or whoever says so but because such is the nature of things as they evolved since both countries joined the Euro.
Significantly, right from the start Portugal was deservedly one of the single-currency's founding members. Greece was not.
What went wrong thereafter is mentioned in the article.
A double whammy brought about by the EU's eastward expansion adding 10+2 poorer countries (a couple of exceptions) to the then EU15 and cut-throat competition from Asia in an increasingly globalised world.
Portugal being a small open economy with several yet unaddressed structural problems immediately felt the strains.It was ill-equipped, if at all, to face those 'shocks' by moving up the value-added chain.
The country still managed a short-lived upswing on improved footing just prior to the infamous financial meltdown.
The general collapse of most Western economies was the final blow that knocked down every hope of Portugal returning to higher export-led growth.
2009 ended with the economy shrinking by 2.7%, an appalling setback in the aftermath of a long period of internal adjustment to get public finances under control.As referred in the article a few important reforms were partly accomplished too during this period from 2005.
Portugal's main and toughest challenge is to get the economy to grow meaningfully, regaining lost competitiveness and export market-shares.
How that is to be achieved remains a million-dollar question that may only get answered over the years to 2013.
In the meantime financial markets should give the country some respite.
Portugal's track-record provides conclusive evidence that every cloud has a silver lining.
It is an established fact that Portugal and Greece are different enough for financial markets to take notice.Not because the government or whoever says so but because such is the nature of things as they evolved since both countries joined the Euro.
Significantly, right from the start Portugal was deservedly one of the single-currency's founding members. Greece was not.
What went wrong thereafter is mentioned in the article.
A double whammy brought about by the EU's eastward expansion adding 10+2 poorer countries (a couple of exceptions) to the then EU15 and cut-throat competition from Asia in an increasingly globalised world.
Portugal being a small open economy with several yet unaddressed structural problems immediately felt the strains.It was ill-equipped, if at all, to face those 'shocks' by moving up the value-added chain.
The country still managed a short-lived upswing on improved footing just prior to the infamous financial meltdown.
The general collapse of most Western economies was the final blow that knocked down every hope of Portugal returning to higher export-led growth.
2009 ended with the economy shrinking by 2.7%, an appalling setback in the aftermath of a long period of internal adjustment to get public finances under control.As referred in the article a few important reforms were partly accomplished too during this period from 2005.
Portugal's main and toughest challenge is to get the economy to grow meaningfully, regaining lost competitiveness and export market-shares.
How that is to be achieved remains a million-dollar question that may only get answered over the years to 2013.
In the meantime financial markets should give the country some respite.
Portugal's track-record provides conclusive evidence that every cloud has a silver lining.
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Gostei dos seu comentários no Economist,
ResponderEliminarVer também comentários no blog
PPP Lusofonia