domingo, 5 de setembro de 2010
TEc - "Clearing up the climate" The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change has a rough ride
There's a great deal at stake when climate change is the subject matter of
discussion.
The IPCC - despite every shortcoming in its organigram, make-up, scientific work, reviewing/editing methods and failings so far acknowledged - is a great institutional project in the making.
Its studies, assessments and findings should be exclusively based and guided by fundamentally sound scientific principles and data retrieved and processed to objectively reveal the extent to which the climate is indeed changing.
How much is owed to human activity and most importantly what can be done to mitigate the impact or even reverse or delay the nastier consequences.
There can hardly be two ways to look into this pressing issue.This is what makes the IPCC's credibility of utmost importance at all times.
In the 'real' world there remain predictably any number of parties interested in downplaying whatever 'unsuitable' findings may surface.The scientific community may also disagree on some key points but I would imagine a convergence there based on science, evidence and fact much more likely to set in.Irrespective of any external influences, however, the IPCC on collecting the analysis and field work developed by the working groups - duly reviewing them - must be able to produce summed up conclusions that are sharp and insightful.Depicting the reality about our climate as it presents itself.Not as straightforward as might be expected but the twenty years of solid experience in its track-record is relevant enough.
The InterAcademy Council report should impact the IPCC in exactly the way that it was intended for.
The vast majority of anonymous inhabitants of Planet Earth, nearly 7 billion of them, expect the scientific elite - necessarily a small group of highly qualified individuals - to speak the truth and nothing but the truth once they have finalized their labours.And the IPCC tells it loud and clear to governments and rulers of the day.Wherever.Whoever.Whenever.
discussion.
The IPCC - despite every shortcoming in its organigram, make-up, scientific work, reviewing/editing methods and failings so far acknowledged - is a great institutional project in the making.
Its studies, assessments and findings should be exclusively based and guided by fundamentally sound scientific principles and data retrieved and processed to objectively reveal the extent to which the climate is indeed changing.
How much is owed to human activity and most importantly what can be done to mitigate the impact or even reverse or delay the nastier consequences.
There can hardly be two ways to look into this pressing issue.This is what makes the IPCC's credibility of utmost importance at all times.
In the 'real' world there remain predictably any number of parties interested in downplaying whatever 'unsuitable' findings may surface.The scientific community may also disagree on some key points but I would imagine a convergence there based on science, evidence and fact much more likely to set in.Irrespective of any external influences, however, the IPCC on collecting the analysis and field work developed by the working groups - duly reviewing them - must be able to produce summed up conclusions that are sharp and insightful.Depicting the reality about our climate as it presents itself.Not as straightforward as might be expected but the twenty years of solid experience in its track-record is relevant enough.
The InterAcademy Council report should impact the IPCC in exactly the way that it was intended for.
The vast majority of anonymous inhabitants of Planet Earth, nearly 7 billion of them, expect the scientific elite - necessarily a small group of highly qualified individuals - to speak the truth and nothing but the truth once they have finalized their labours.And the IPCC tells it loud and clear to governments and rulers of the day.Wherever.Whoever.Whenever.
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário