If it should signal the end of the 3-century long Act of Union with England then the more likely outcome will also mean the dissolution of modern-day United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The political and administrative consequences are of course relevant but to a newspaper like 'The Economist' the economic fallout must be dealt with in earnest beforehand.
Are average Scots reasonably well documented on the subject or will they get carried away by overblown feelings of cultural heritage and self-identity?
Scotland's economy has had multiple strengths over the centuries, remaining to this day basically sound and a diversified one.
Oil features topmost but is not overwhelming.
Some of those strengths originated from its close interaction with the UK as a whole.
It is obvious that relations with England have faced many ups and downs as would be expected of neighbours showing such disproportionate demographies.
Not just economically.
Then again I am mostly ignorant of how deep nationalist feelings for political independence run amongst common folk taking into account their kinship with the English nurtured over so many years now.
Besides, devolution of government has meant that Scotland already enjoys a great degree of autonomy running its own affairs.
Hopefully it will be one taken in full knowledge of the pros/cons as well as the consequences.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário