The Falklands' referendum result was never in any doubt nor the size of the Yes vote.
If anything, the only surprise is the 3 No votes reportedly cast.
The archipelago's long sovereignty dispute will linger on endlessly. It has been fought on entirely different arguments by both sides. Needless to go over them as State views by either party are well-known and have been reiterated time and again.
Popular feeling in Argentina towards de jure ownership of Las Malvinas - a French derived name by the way - runs very deep, irrespective of political leadership at any given time.
The UK on the other hand is hardly ready for any terms of discussion other than its own. This stance has hardened from 1982 after the country's victorious war was paid for in relevant blood and treasure.
Despite the Falklands being a faraway, windswept, thinly populated rather inhospitable outpost, it is likely to strike a sensitive British nerve if ever perceived to be under threat. Least of all a military one.
Besides, some investment has poured in and the existence of oil-rich waters surrounding the islands adds a new dimension to the equation.
Which equation anyway?
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário