quinta-feira, 31 de outubro de 2013
FT - America's misplaced lecture to Germany, writes Gideon Rachman - my view is broader because Germany is politically bound to the EU.
A more balanced reflection of reality would have us acknowledge both criticisms are right.
The US has had a past history of excessive domestic consumption fuelled by overindebtedness while showing increasing fiscal pressures over many years. Raising the debt-ceiling again and again will always find cause with meeting the needs of the day by the government of the day.
But, shouldn't the question be asked as to what the ultimate ceiling is(?) - the one that tops every other ceiling broken before?
Or is that a minor issue that can be overlooked every time by winning a vote in Congress?
Germany, on the other hand, does show remarkable internal strengths most nations would wish for.
An economy and society not without its weak spots but so far able to check public accounts and a majority of macroeconomic variables consistently.
Except that Germany is no longer a stand-alone country. And has not been in decades.
It is bound, unlike most others in the larger EU and the 17-member Eurozone, to take stock of the EU-wide implications and responsibilities of its own domestic policies.
It is fair to conclude that the single currency has been a boon to Germany while a questionable gamble - to varying degrees - to many others, at the very least.
Despite the fact that the Euro remains a work-in-progress a few practical lessons have been delivered (to those wanting to learn) by the never-ending economic crisis the Eurozone is trapped in.
At some point in time I believe politics that aims higher will have to kick in. Will it?
Or else the common currency will continue to stifle growth and spread imbalances across countries sharing it.
Exactly the opposite of what the Euro's creation envisaged in the context of building a European Union.
Restoring balances in deficit countries must be matched by well-placed stimulus in surplus countries.
Both should go in tandem if ever the EU is to move forward as one.
The US has had a past history of excessive domestic consumption fuelled by overindebtedness while showing increasing fiscal pressures over many years. Raising the debt-ceiling again and again will always find cause with meeting the needs of the day by the government of the day.
But, shouldn't the question be asked as to what the ultimate ceiling is(?) - the one that tops every other ceiling broken before?
Or is that a minor issue that can be overlooked every time by winning a vote in Congress?
Germany, on the other hand, does show remarkable internal strengths most nations would wish for.
An economy and society not without its weak spots but so far able to check public accounts and a majority of macroeconomic variables consistently.
Except that Germany is no longer a stand-alone country. And has not been in decades.
It is bound, unlike most others in the larger EU and the 17-member Eurozone, to take stock of the EU-wide implications and responsibilities of its own domestic policies.
It is fair to conclude that the single currency has been a boon to Germany while a questionable gamble - to varying degrees - to many others, at the very least.
Despite the fact that the Euro remains a work-in-progress a few practical lessons have been delivered (to those wanting to learn) by the never-ending economic crisis the Eurozone is trapped in.
At some point in time I believe politics that aims higher will have to kick in. Will it?
Or else the common currency will continue to stifle growth and spread imbalances across countries sharing it.
Exactly the opposite of what the Euro's creation envisaged in the context of building a European Union.
Restoring balances in deficit countries must be matched by well-placed stimulus in surplus countries.
Both should go in tandem if ever the EU is to move forward as one.
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário