I'm beginning to wonder whether there's any use left for Summits that don't deliver on fundamentals.
Or whether there is anything at all politicians can do to right wrongs especially when up against those-by-now infamous financial markets and rating agencies.
Setting aside rhetorical questions that keep nagging nevertheless, the latest Summit fell far short of expectations raised to make or break status. What next?
Pace of events will continue to be determined by the bond-market/s. Politicians have been cast to the sidelines merely reacting after the fact.
Germany's Angela Merkel is again a winner in that her long adopted step-by-step approach remains firmly in place.
We move into 2012 not knowing if the Euro can endure much longer under current assumptions and self-imposed strictures by the relevant institutions underpinning it.
If only I could spot a ray of hope besides believing (wishfully?) most leaders are fully aware of where the stakes are should the Euro fail.
Every nation in the EU - and further afield - will be a loser the difference being the size and permanence of the loss.
But also if hard-pressed financially-strapped countries fail to resume sound economic growth.
When it is about countries as collective entities - each one being a rather complex reality on its own - fast paced development is fuelled by internal as well as external variables.
Both these remain largely favourable to fast economic growth even if slower than up to now.
It does share one important specific characteristic: emerging economies possess vast untapped potential both in demography and unfulfilled needs.
This is totally unlike countries that already reached developed status long ago such as Japan and the original Asian tigers to a lesser degree.
All together make up the world's fastest growing continent with the greatest potential to keep growing for many years to come.