sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2010
What I think about 'Let the Greeks ruin themselves' by The Economist
Just about everything has been said on Greece and the drag it has become on the Euro.
Many saw it looming large from day one as pointed out in the article.I must add I never quite understood the Greek 'miracle' then performed in the eleventh-hour dash for the Euro.
While Portugal and Spain made a serious sustained effort to fulfil the Maastricht-criteria - which both did - including the two-year ERM stint to get into the core 11-member founding group, I thought Greece had somehow jumped lightly on board .
I also remember the concerns expressed then by qualified Germans as to the economic and financial track-record of Southern Europe.
It is definitely unacceptable to deal with Mediterranean countries as if they were a single entity despite similarities largely dismissed when this particular issue is closely assessed.
There are objectively wide differences between them none more so than with Greece whose EU-membership credentials are hazy at the very least.
Since joining in 1981 the country has benefited the most on per capita net revenue from EU assistance under multiple funding programmes.Yet governments there whether led by Pasok (mostly)or by New Democracy engaged in and actively sponsored what can only be termed as short-term view irresponsible populist government.As long as they could get external finance and could sell their dodgy billing to EU partners.Or quietly go unnoticed.
Other than defending the Euro for the Euro's sake I do not see any good in coming to Greece's rescue.It would be tantamount to rewarding recurrent misbehaviour at the highest levels.
Worse still it would likely put off once again significant internal adjustments in Greek society.
Many saw it looming large from day one as pointed out in the article.I must add I never quite understood the Greek 'miracle' then performed in the eleventh-hour dash for the Euro.
While Portugal and Spain made a serious sustained effort to fulfil the Maastricht-criteria - which both did - including the two-year ERM stint to get into the core 11-member founding group, I thought Greece had somehow jumped lightly on board .
I also remember the concerns expressed then by qualified Germans as to the economic and financial track-record of Southern Europe.
It is definitely unacceptable to deal with Mediterranean countries as if they were a single entity despite similarities largely dismissed when this particular issue is closely assessed.
There are objectively wide differences between them none more so than with Greece whose EU-membership credentials are hazy at the very least.
Since joining in 1981 the country has benefited the most on per capita net revenue from EU assistance under multiple funding programmes.Yet governments there whether led by Pasok (mostly)or by New Democracy engaged in and actively sponsored what can only be termed as short-term view irresponsible populist government.As long as they could get external finance and could sell their dodgy billing to EU partners.Or quietly go unnoticed.
Other than defending the Euro for the Euro's sake I do not see any good in coming to Greece's rescue.It would be tantamount to rewarding recurrent misbehaviour at the highest levels.
Worse still it would likely put off once again significant internal adjustments in Greek society.
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário