quarta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2010
WTO and trade disputes, trailing The Economist's: When partners attack
Perhaps the world is mired by trade disputes because it still remains stuck with out-of-date concepts such as protectionism and dumping.
All efforts must go into building a new framework through which trade is made to become mutually beneficial sectorwise, countrywise and multiwise.Not easy to achieve - an overambitious search for perfect trading relationships that would prove a win-win to all.
Yet I fail to see how else we can advance economies everywhere which amounts to saying fostering economic advance everywhere simultaneously.
The article makes it look like it's a jungle out there wherein the WTO is as close as countries (or the international community) will ever get to restore some law and order.
There are however more than a few glimmers of hope that the WTO does deliver.I would like to underscore the mention made to 70% of disputes finding settlement.
Since the days of GATT the exchange of goods between countries has never been a straightforward, linear business conducive to mutual advantage.
Nevertheless the WTO remains the best effort made to date to achieve generally agreed goals.
China's recent membership was timely, representing a big additional challenge to the organisation too.
The country's accession was feared by many but a sound evaluation of the period that has elapsed would likely reach the conclusion that more has been gained than lost.
Trade flows have surged and may now be better regulated than before.Or potentially they may be so.
As China displaces Germany to become the world's biggest exporter the focus must shift to fair trade.
There being no perfect solutions in an imperfect world the WTO is the best hope that free trade can flow beset by disputes yes - on and off - that at least have a forum where they may be "...settled by negotiation, presumably to the satisfaction of both parties".
All efforts must go into building a new framework through which trade is made to become mutually beneficial sectorwise, countrywise and multiwise.Not easy to achieve - an overambitious search for perfect trading relationships that would prove a win-win to all.
Yet I fail to see how else we can advance economies everywhere which amounts to saying fostering economic advance everywhere simultaneously.
The article makes it look like it's a jungle out there wherein the WTO is as close as countries (or the international community) will ever get to restore some law and order.
There are however more than a few glimmers of hope that the WTO does deliver.I would like to underscore the mention made to 70% of disputes finding settlement.
Since the days of GATT the exchange of goods between countries has never been a straightforward, linear business conducive to mutual advantage.
Nevertheless the WTO remains the best effort made to date to achieve generally agreed goals.
China's recent membership was timely, representing a big additional challenge to the organisation too.
The country's accession was feared by many but a sound evaluation of the period that has elapsed would likely reach the conclusion that more has been gained than lost.
Trade flows have surged and may now be better regulated than before.Or potentially they may be so.
As China displaces Germany to become the world's biggest exporter the focus must shift to fair trade.
There being no perfect solutions in an imperfect world the WTO is the best hope that free trade can flow beset by disputes yes - on and off - that at least have a forum where they may be "...settled by negotiation, presumably to the satisfaction of both parties".
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário