Fellow debaters have thrown in considerable argument generally against the motion.
Indeed most people who've given it some thought are led to the conclusion that English is far richer in diversity.
Languages are living entities, dynamic, open to inputs, ever-changing over time but not structurally changeable.This is exactly what makes any attempts at standardization appear forceful and artificial.
Yes native speakers of variants of English may need some adjusting before they feel comfortable communicating confidently.
Non-native speakers may even have an edge in that they would more easily pick up whichever variant.
As the debate rages on I am glad to notice that an overwhelming majority oppose the motion.
From scholars to common folk most agree that the future of English lies in the wealth of diversity.
I love the sound and challenge of every accent of spoken American, Canadian, Irish, British, South African, Indian, Australian and New Zealand English - and many more numerically minor but nonetheless relevant variants of the language.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário