domingo, 15 de agosto de 2010
TEC debate motion "China offers a better development model than the West" An upstream question is not answered.
After hesitating a lot between casting a "No" vote and not voting at all I chose the former to express lack of first-hand knowledge on China's model.
What is the Chinese development model if indeed there is one that can fairly be compared to the West's?The West for its part is made up of many countries with diverse economic, social and political backgrounds but let us assume we can aptly lump them all together.
China's development model - whichever it is - appears to mainly suit itself presently, having evolved substantially where the economy is concerned.
Politically while it may be said that the country is now generally more open, one-party rule remains firmly in place and there is no sign of a move towards western-style democracy anytime soon.
Therefore China's overall model is different rather than comparable to the West's.
Most Western countries have over the years pursued a path especially since WW2 that combined the virtues of the market with social policies and full political freedoms.
China has been busy creating wealth growing its economy by leaps and bounds sidelining any relevant concerns with everything else.
As the country becomes richer with a more mature economy so are the development costs being incurred likely to surface urgently demanding to get addressed.
I find it intriguing that the revered "The Economist" should put forward such a blunt motion statement.
Unless the dazzle caused by China's quick economic rise is reason enough to provoke all manner of thought.
What is the Chinese development model if indeed there is one that can fairly be compared to the West's?The West for its part is made up of many countries with diverse economic, social and political backgrounds but let us assume we can aptly lump them all together.
China's development model - whichever it is - appears to mainly suit itself presently, having evolved substantially where the economy is concerned.
Politically while it may be said that the country is now generally more open, one-party rule remains firmly in place and there is no sign of a move towards western-style democracy anytime soon.
Therefore China's overall model is different rather than comparable to the West's.
Most Western countries have over the years pursued a path especially since WW2 that combined the virtues of the market with social policies and full political freedoms.
China has been busy creating wealth growing its economy by leaps and bounds sidelining any relevant concerns with everything else.
As the country becomes richer with a more mature economy so are the development costs being incurred likely to surface urgently demanding to get addressed.
I find it intriguing that the revered "The Economist" should put forward such a blunt motion statement.
Unless the dazzle caused by China's quick economic rise is reason enough to provoke all manner of thought.
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário